<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help from the community ensures a smooth download experience for Firefox 3.0.8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.justdave.net/dave/2009/03/29/help-from-the-community-ensures-a-smooth-download-experience-for-firefox-308/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.justdave.net/dave/2009/03/29/help-from-the-community-ensures-a-smooth-download-experience-for-firefox-308/</link>
	<description>Random Ramblings of a Sysadmin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.justdave.net/dave/2009/03/29/help-from-the-community-ensures-a-smooth-download-experience-for-firefox-308/comment-page-1/#comment-59543</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justdave.net/dave/?p=178#comment-59543</guid>
		<description>+1 for Bittorrent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 for Bittorrent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gardiner</title>
		<link>http://www.justdave.net/dave/2009/03/29/help-from-the-community-ensures-a-smooth-download-experience-for-firefox-308/comment-page-1/#comment-59538</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gardiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justdave.net/dave/?p=178#comment-59538</guid>
		<description>On a similar line to Tomer, my ISP has Firefox on their download mirror site http://mirror.internode.on.net/ (which means it doesn&#039;t count towards my download quota).

It would be great if Firefox could prefer that mirror. It then be would be faster and cheaper for us.

-dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a similar line to Tomer, my ISP has Firefox on their download mirror site <a href="http://mirror.internode.on.net/" rel="nofollow">http://mirror.internode.on.net/</a> (which means it doesn&#8217;t count towards my download quota).</p>
<p>It would be great if Firefox could prefer that mirror. It then be would be faster and cheaper for us.</p>
<p>-dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanjstr</title>
		<link>http://www.justdave.net/dave/2009/03/29/help-from-the-community-ensures-a-smooth-download-experience-for-firefox-308/comment-page-1/#comment-59494</link>
		<dc:creator>alanjstr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justdave.net/dave/?p=178#comment-59494</guid>
		<description>As someone already mentioned, and as I&#039;m sure someone always mentions, we could leverage bittorrent.  This already exists as bug 236755.  Obviously we&#039;d let the user choose whether to do a straight download vs torrent and what options to seed that torrent with.  The torrent could auto-stop after 48 hours, for example.  It doesn&#039;t have to be a full-blown bittorrent client.  It just needs to handle the mozilla parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone already mentioned, and as I&#8217;m sure someone always mentions, we could leverage bittorrent.  This already exists as bug 236755.  Obviously we&#8217;d let the user choose whether to do a straight download vs torrent and what options to seed that torrent with.  The torrent could auto-stop after 48 hours, for example.  It doesn&#8217;t have to be a full-blown bittorrent client.  It just needs to handle the mozilla parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomer Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.justdave.net/dave/2009/03/29/help-from-the-community-ensures-a-smooth-download-experience-for-firefox-308/comment-page-1/#comment-59446</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomer Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justdave.net/dave/?p=178#comment-59446</guid>
		<description>Thanks to your post, I guess you&#039;ll get some more mirror servers in few days. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to your post, I guess you&#8217;ll get some more mirror servers in few days. <img src='http://www.justdave.net/dave/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg K Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://www.justdave.net/dave/2009/03/29/help-from-the-community-ensures-a-smooth-download-experience-for-firefox-308/comment-page-1/#comment-59434</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg K Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justdave.net/dave/?p=178#comment-59434</guid>
		<description>Hmm...

...

BitTorrent!

What if every Firefox browser was a BitTorrent client that seeded the latest update it was aware of, using peer exchange, at a very low upstream speed?

And what if every Firefox browser requested updates by BitTorrent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>BitTorrent!</p>
<p>What if every Firefox browser was a BitTorrent client that seeded the latest update it was aware of, using peer exchange, at a very low upstream speed?</p>
<p>And what if every Firefox browser requested updates by BitTorrent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justdave</title>
		<link>http://www.justdave.net/dave/2009/03/29/help-from-the-community-ensures-a-smooth-download-experience-for-firefox-308/comment-page-1/#comment-59417</link>
		<dc:creator>justdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justdave.net/dave/?p=178#comment-59417</guid>
		<description>Not currently.  We hope to have it doing so in the near future (probably sometime this summer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not currently.  We hope to have it doing so in the near future (probably sometime this summer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomer Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.justdave.net/dave/2009/03/29/help-from-the-community-ensures-a-smooth-download-experience-for-firefox-308/comment-page-1/#comment-59416</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomer Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justdave.net/dave/?p=178#comment-59416</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just wondering - Does the redirection script support serving files from a location close to the user?

Our international inbound/outbount Internet access is recently become limited by the ISPs, but access to a nearby server might be faster. I don&#039;t think it would be helpful for other countries, but will give better download speeds for local users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just wondering &#8211; Does the redirection script support serving files from a location close to the user?</p>
<p>Our international inbound/outbount Internet access is recently become limited by the ISPs, but access to a nearby server might be faster. I don&#8217;t think it would be helpful for other countries, but will give better download speeds for local users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.482 seconds -->

